games Players with penalties Week 7
- Camus Gallego J. CAMUNO (Atco. Osasuna) TWO MATCHES (RFEF Disciplinary Code Article 117)
- "OSVALDO "(Espanyol), three parties (UNO, under Article 123 and DOS, pursuant to Article 120).
- "TREZEGUET" (Hercules) Two Parties (Article 120)
- "MUSACCHIO" (Villarreal) A GAME (Rule 123)
RFEF Regulation
ART. 120. Protest
protests to the referee so obvious or pushy to the referee, assistants and the fourth official, provided that does not constitute a more serious, punishable by suspension from one to three matches or for up to a month.
ART. 123. Violence Occur
play a violent game occasion or as a direct result of any release of it, provided that the action gives rise to risk, but there are no harmful or detrimental consequences, is punishable by suspension from one to three games or times a month.
The sporting sanction Osvaldo is also accompanied by a financial penalty:
File No. 114 - 2010/2011
In Las Rozas (Madrid), October 19, 2010, meeting the Competition Committee of the RFEF
composed D. Alfredo Florez Plaza, D. Cardinal Miguel Carro and D.
Arnaldo Enrique Alcubilla to resolve incidences with
occasion of the celebration party for the National Championship
Premier League, played on 17 of the current between the clubs
RCD Mallorca SAD and RCD Espanyol de Barcelona SAD adopts the following
BACKGROUND RESOLUTION
First .- The Arbitration Act, in section of players, under the heading of expulsions, literally transcribed, said: "RCD Espanyol de Barcelona SAD: In 35 minutes the player (17) Osvaldo, Pablo Daniel was expelled for the following reason: for elbowing an opponent in your face, challenging for the ball, taking care that they receive continuing the game. "
also in the chapter on "other incidents" it is stated that: "After showing the red card player RCD Espanyol de Barcelona SAD race number 17 D. Pablo Daniel Osvaldo he turned to me as follows "You are a disaster," repeatedly. At the same time As was retreating to the locker room addressed the audience clapping tier.
Second .- In a timely manner RCD Espanyol de Barcelona SAD formula written statement, providing videographic evidence.
LEGAL BASIS
One .- In the timely submitted a written statement by the representative of RCD Espanyol of Barcelona, \u200b\u200bSAD, formulation of the motion for the repeal and rescind the expulsion card he was shown the player of its workforce Don Pablo Daniel Osvaldo, to understand incurred in an arbitration error from the time that that player does not make any gesture stating his intention to attack or hit with his elbow the opposing player, and also stated in that letter that there was the least damaging result despite the fact that the simulated opponent.
Second .- Certainly the outcome of the review of the pictures produced has ruled out the course of aggression referred to in Article 98 of the Disciplinary Code RFEF, and also ruled that the action was a decisive factor of a harmful result, but the same reality shows, not denied by the pleader, that the impact occurred, even if not with the intent to cause harm, but accepting the possibility of a fraud action is contemplated and provided for under Article 123 of that Disciplinary Code, not concurring
in any way exceptional circumstances the decision of the college could be a material error manifest. Third .-
also the representative of RCD Espanyol of Barcelona, \u200b\u200bSAD refers to the expressions uttered by that player after his expulsion, which have their proper classification under section 120 of the Disciplinary Code RFEF.
For the foregoing reasons, the Competition Committee AGREED:
First .- suspended for one game to the player of RCD Espanyol of Barcelona, \u200b\u200bSAD, D. Pablo Daniel Osvaldo, under Article 123 of the Disciplinary Code RFEF with accessory penalty in an amount of 90 € to club Yde € 600 to the offender (Article 52). Second
for TWO MATCHES .- Suspend to said player, D. Pablo Daniel Osvaldo, pursuant to section 120 of that order, with a fine accessory in the amount of 180 € and 600 € club soccer (52).
against this resolution be brought before the Appeals Committee within ten working days, counting from the day following receipt of the notification.
0 comments:
Post a Comment